Germany has yet to politically formulate which ideas of living together in a society that has become much more pluralistic through migration can be negotiated as a guiding principle of a new national narrative. Canada and the United States, on the other hand, actively promoted the establishment of a political integration narrative in the 1970s against a backdrop of declining social cohesion and actively formulated their national identities either as "unity in diversity" or as a "nation of immigrants" and made it their political integration agenda
Need for a New Concept to Describe Germany's Transformation into a Country of Immigration
/ 3 Minuten zu lesen
Germany's society can be described post-migrant: Affiliations, national identities, participation and equality are being renegotiated and adjusted against the backdrop of increasing diversity. Unlike in the United States or Canada, however, a guiding principle of a new national narrative has not yet been established.
In political terms, public institutions are being called upon to open up interculturally and to investigate whether their structures represent the altered, heterogeneous fabric of society, i.e., are open to people with migration backgrounds. Parallel to this, "integration from below" – a kind of civil integration as civic, personal awareness of integration – can be supported by clearly linking Germany's narrative as a heterogeneous country with the notion that adaptive efforts are also expected of those who do not have a migration background. The formation of a heterogeneous society (in the sense of a new narrative or a guiding principle of "unity in diversity," in which integration must be socio-structurally available to every citizen) leads to a paradigm shift in the concept of integration. Policy should be judged by how it promotes the opening of structures and institutions as well as by how it anchors this narrative of a heterogeneous society in such a way that all members of society are expected to make an effort, not only migrants. In this sense it should dissolve the established dichotomy of migrants and natives in favor of a citizens' identity aimed at social integration processes as a common goal. Integration, as founder of comparative political science Alexis de Tocqueville used the term, would thus become the core objective of a modern democracy, which must establish equal participation rights and opportunities for all its citizens.
Germany would therefore need to engage in a non-partisan discussion to establish a guiding principle. "A professional and political non-partisan committee, for example under the auspices of the Minister for Integration"
Acknowledging heterogeneity as German normality will be accompanied by a narrative reinterpretation of national identity – "Germanness" is changing and becoming more ambiguous. Federal President Joachim Gauck also conveyed this idea in his speech on the 65th anniversary of the German Constitution, saying, "In the future, it will be much more difficult than before to detect who is German based on their name or appearance."
This text is part of the policy brief
Dr. Naika Foroutan is vice director of the Berlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research (BIM) at the Humboldt University of Berlin. Her research and teaching focuses on the topics of migration and integration; images of Islam and Muslims in Germany; identity and hybridity; political Islam; and the transformation of countries of immigration.
E-Mail Link: foroutan@hu-berlin.de
Wir laden Sie zu einer kurzen Befragung zu unserem Internetauftritt ein. Bitte nehmen Sie sich 5 Minuten Zeit, um uns bei der Verbesserung unserer Website zu helfen. Ihre Angaben sind anonym.
Vielen Dank für Ihre Unterstützung!